'S That time again when the Librarian of Congress is considering special exceptions to the anti-cicrumvention the DMCA. One of the main proposals, which we spoke earlier, the application was publicized in order to allow people to rip DVDs for personal use - just like today, we are all capable of extracting CDs for personal use (for example, to perform music to a portable device). The MPAA (with the RIAA and others) have responded to requests for exemption (pdf) with all sorts of crazy claims, but let's focus on the issue of DVD copy, because that's where the madness Hollywood logic becomes clear.



In fact, the MPAA argued that there is no evidence that one DVD copying is legal, since the anti-circumvention exemptions should be for legal purposes, this exemption should not apply. Leaving aside the absolute ridiculous that we have to apply for exemptions from statutory legal acts (I know, I know ...), it is a statement of the MPAA. While it is true that there has been no formal decision on the legality of extracting a DVD, the fact that CD ripping is legal considers the film seems to suggest that the extraction is comparable.

But most important, the MPAA says, because they offer limited forms, expensive and boring to watch movies in other places, you should have the move right to place on their own:

owners of copyrights are many DVD players Blu-ray disc copies of purchase of digital movies that can be read on mobile devices and computers as licenses . Buyers of Blu-Ray can also enjoy the "Managed Copy" services that are planned for launch in the U.S. later this year. Film distributors and technology companies are also making available services such as ultraviolet , allowing consumers access to moving images in a variety of peripherals via streaming and downloading. Many films and television programs are also available through services like Comcast Xfinity, Hulu and Netflix, or sites websites operated by broadcasters or cable channels, consumers can enjoy from anywhere in the U.S. Internet access. With all these solutions on the market at PK points to alleged problems, there is little likely that the presence of CSS on DVD will have a material adverse impact on the ability of consumers in exchange for space in the next three years.

Note that most of these " market solutions "means you have to pay several times the same content - and ignore the fact that these offers are very limited and can not have the content of DVDs people. Public Knowledge is a brief summary of how these "solutions" are not solutions at all:

The MPAA had two specific proposals. First, consumers can buy access to a subscription service like Netflix Hulu. Do not dwell on the fact that 1) this will have to pay again to access a movie you already own, 2) these services require a high-speed Internet connection at work, and 3) There is a reasonable possibility that you own the movie is not available in any of these services at some point, and 4) regular MPAA member studios pull videos that were once available in the services outside of these services. second suggestion of the MPAA was even less helpful. In his remarks, told the program that Warner Brothers' DVD2Blu. This program allows people to use their existing DVD, a coupon for the purchase of a handful of Warner Blu-Ray. Do not dwell on the fact that 1) This program is limited to Warner Brothers films, 2) the program is limited to 25 bags per household, 3), while some Blu-ray include digital copies that can be moved to other devices, it is difficult how many discs DVD2Blu program include this option, and 4) only 100 films are included in the overall program, and 5) the costs of each change of at least $ 4.95 plus shipping (which, for recording, is about the same amount it would cost to buy the digital file to Amazon.).

When you think about it, it is really crazy. They say, because they give you the option to pay for an overpriced, limited selection can not really exist, they should have the right to rip your DVD. It would be like saying that the record industry does can burn CDs because they offer a limited selection of people locked in a music store. would revolt to these claims, and must find the ridiculous claims of the MPAA here just gross.

If the MPAA not stop there, would be crazy enough ... but not in the spirit of Hollywood, they must go further. They claim that because of the possibility of rip the DVD to take away their ability to hold a charge for the same content several times again, that goes against the purpose of copyright seriously they are actually claiming their ridiculous "windows" are "new business models" that copyright is to encourage ..:


In fact, the proposed exemption would be granted PK directly contrary to the purpose of this regulation. It would undermine emerging business models that increase access to creative works in the way, precisely, Congress intended the DMCA to promote. . If you want to increase access, allowing you to
Find best price for : --MPAA--