The interest is being renewed in the questionable deal between the RIAA / MPAA and the largest ISPs in the U.S. to establish a "six strikes" graduated response plan to cause trouble for the accused (not convicted) file sharing, some are beginning to realize that the whole plan deserves serious attention from antitrust authorities. After all, you have representatives of the two main industries that come together in a room to agree on a plan that will make access to the Internet more expensive

for users.

more, since it is based on charges of simple (no convictions) - and costs from a company with a terrible record of accuracy - which "have to pay to defy a strike (the most ridiculous of all), if you make the contest, you are limited to only six defenses - are much lower than that permitted by copyright. In other words, if the work is public domain, but published after 1923,

you do no defense official

part of the plan. In other words, not only provide for the participation of collusion among major industries, but from the beginning to assume guilt before innocence, makes you pay claim that you are innocent, and even allow you to use base defenses You offered under copyright.



All this seems of dubious legality. It also allows direct participation of the White House in the negotiation of this plan are even worse. And, again, we wonder why the real interest groups, Internet users, not given a seat at the table. If this is the case, perhaps it could have been avoided.
course, given the involvement of the White House in negotiating an agreement, it seems very likely that the Attorney General will take the trouble to examine the agreement, since, would effectively challenge his own boss.
Find best price for : --plan----Sean--