Many people were legitimately concerned about how trading on financial markets through systems operations high frequency algorithmic trading operation faster than any of us can understand, on the basis several algorithms, trying to shave bits and pieces for profit. The main concern, of course, is that these algorithms can get into some infinite loop issue spinning out of control markets. We had momentary echoes sometimes happened so fast he did not even clear what happened. And now we have a case where a tweet overreaction to false financial markets may have cost 136000000000 dollars briefly (yes, with ab).

The story is that Twitter feed from the Associated Press was hacked and false tweet was posted that said: "Breaking:. Two explosions at the White House and Barack Obama is wounded "

and it was Wall Street, sending the stock market down very quickly. Of course, after the report has been corrected and is quickly shown to be false, the market recovered quickly - however, in the bottom and rises, it is likely that some people lose a lot of money and of Others have done very well. However, this raises another set of questions, even on concerns about high frequency trading, belonging to different inputs it receives. Reacting to articles on Twitter is an interesting way to try to beat the news cycle. Since so many stories break on Twitter First, it is not surprising that Wall Street eagerly explores the news service affecting the market. The real question is whether something can or should be done about it. One argument is that we can leave him alone because he is against-productive. If the system has jumped the gun and traded down in this report and,
good

, you deserve to lose money trading on a fake tweet. Similarly, the fact that the market has shown that it can again be corrected fairly quickly, but there are billions to be made and lost in the middle.

For those who think it
Find best price for : --tweet----Wall--