format differences are changing the nature of what they read and how we do

most readers, I think, in this day saw the "Medieval Helpdesk" Norwegian television sketch where a monk exasperated need help to start working with a new patch and dreaded "book". It's funny - if loopily anachronistic, the codex had existed since the first century. But they are based on the presumption that every time I start to question the technological changes in the way we read affect only secondary aspects, cosmetics and essential reading. There is a kind of dualism at work bookish. The text is the soul, and the book - or a tablet or scroll vellum, or clay or a rope with knots in the case of quipu - is the perishable body. In this spirit, the ebook is the book, separated only paper, ink and sewing. If the debate on the e-book goes from flashing nostalgic smell and rampant gadget fetishism, it is time to reflect on the true foundation.

There are two aspects to the ebook that I find profoundly change the relationship between the reader and the text. With the book, the reader's relationship with the text is private, and the book is still in space, time and the reader. None of these proposals is necessarily the case with the eBook.

The ebook packs a lot of information about our reading habits: when you begin to read, when we stop, how fast or slow we read when we skip pages when we read again, choose what to highlight, what we choose to read more. As a critic Franco Moretti, the author charts, maps, trees: abstract models for literary history, this information is invaluable. For publishers, it could very well come with a price tag. What to do with the publishers of these data? If 50% of readers stopped reading his postmodern thriller on page 98, the editor may recommend that for version 2.0, bouncing on page 110. While the relationship between the book the reader is privacy, with the ebook that we are all part of a focus group is not recognized. Have small codex containing the Gospel of St. John, or Tom Paine rights had the impact it did if all players knew they had opened the first page?

This brings me to my second point. China Mi?ville, Edinburgh World Writers Conference last year, raised the idea of ??"guerrilla" editors - text readers again, as the reaction of the fans of The Phantom Menace, The Phantom Edition. As Jaron Lanier argues in his new book that belongs to the future? the biggest digital companies collect large amounts of information about our likes, dislikes, economic activity, preferences and attention span, as such. What happens when this information is returned to the "specific reader" book? These things have existed in rudimentary form - my parents bought my younger brother a book when I was about five years, which is also called the central character "Gordon" and the house in which he lived was in a town called "Lilliesleaf" the ur-text behind it would be something like "There once was a [boy / girl] called

Robert Darnton, director of the Library of Harvard University is a glorious sort of fundamentalist literature: in the case of books that show with elegance, this is not good enough for Google scan each book, any intellectual rigor needed to scan all editions (formerly "each sheet first is that" the argument). Certainly, there are subtle differences in reading Tom Jones in the various editions of 1749 - The History of Tom Jones, a foundling, in four volumes is a different experience in a classic Penguin (and very different again from softcore porn Illustrated Tom Jones (Anderson 144) However, the differences could be better compared to hear Beethoven's Ninth Symphony as directed by Karajan, as indicated by Roger Norrington The printed book - .. a work of art in the age of mechanical excellence breeding pair - is surprisingly stable over time, the place and the reader

Find best price for : --Folio----Google----Harvard--