Blog Archive

About Me

Friday, July 15, 2011

postheadericon The Confusing Case Of Lovecraft's Copyrights

It was Joseph who first told me Kranak of the matter. I didn 't understand it then, the forbidden eons machinations of the timeless, that grind man' s nature to dust. At first his story seemed fine, but mundane: an expedition to the famous text by HP Lovecraft, who were rumored to gather in America. But it soon became so awful I almost stopped him for a madman:

To begin, a book was published before 1923 in the public domain. Some of Lovecraft 's early works fall into this time. But all of his most famous works, including "Call of Cthulhu," "Dreams in the Witch House," "At the Mountains of Madness" and so on were written after 1923rd Before 1976, everything works with the Office to avoid a copyright, fall to be registered, and many of Lovecraft 's registered works (the ones published in amateur presses) were almost certainly never in the public domain. In addition, any work published between the years 1923-1963, had to not only have initially registered, but had to have that copyright renewed sometime 1950-1992, avoid to avoid in the public domain. When it was renewed, then it is up to 95 years after the publication protected by copyright. Unfortunately, there 's no official database, which explicitly lists the published works before 1963 had renewed their copyright. The Copyright Office has renewed an online database of works after 1977, but when the work was renewed from 1950 to 1977, requires that the search is characterized by the Copyright Office 's database of the physical paper.

With the help of other scholars, he pursued this uncanny knowledge with urgency, because it had sunk its claws with barbs in his mind and woke up a feverish interest. Things just all the more dangerous when he discovered that there creatures lurk and old dynasties, the claim to the domain Lovecraft texts. They contribute decrepit tablets with the unfathomable arcane runes tongues covered:

It is generally believed that Lovecraft receive all rights, look at his works published in 1926 (although we don 't documentation to have to confirm this). In the period 1923-25 ??he published several works in machines like the amateur tryout that didn 't their copyrights and six plants in Weird Tales, which have registered their copyrights to register. Weird Tales was transferred to what it held the rights to [August] Derleth and [Donald] Wandrei and Arkham House in 1947 ... From the right, the remaining 21 works 1926-37, that Lovecraft published retain rights, his rights were transferred, after his death in 1937 only to his heirs, his aunt, Annie Gamwell. Gamwell transfer the license fees in its will to Derleth and Wandrei, but the copyrights held, and these were transferred to their heirs, Edna Lewis and Ethel Morrish. Morrish and Lewis then transferred at least some of their rights to Arkham House in an agreement. The problem is that the language of the agreement, in the Morrish and Lewis were supposed rights to Derleth and Wandrei not clear what rights are being transferred.

As he spoke, I felt my thoughts turn dark and cold, as if falling into a void, now that I knew always under the volatile and divisive tendencies veil we call reality seethed. All men 's simple pleasures-the stories we share with our friends, the songs we sing in our meetings were, in fact, but facets of this Thing This is evil at work in the dark depths of the cosmic wasteland. It operates outside of time, pushing beyond the reason-an all-powerful, that nothing other than control and the mindless submission of its willing subjects required. Somehow in that moment I heard its bad name, a proto-crazed sound that my imagination assigned to a single cryptic glyph: ?

When many minds would flee to frenzied madness or purge themselves and lay fallow in ignorance, Kranak ventured onwards in pursuit of the essential truth and nature of ?. But his journey ended in an absence of endings, for what he uncovered then was a torturous paradox—an utter lack of resolvable truth that implicitly creates its own truth, a void that fills itself. He learned that the insidious beast of ? can assail common sense by growing more dangerous as it dies, and is sometimes at its strongest when it does not exist at all:

For my money, I 'd say all Lovecraft' s are probably in the public domain ... But there is really no answer to the question of whether they are protected by copyright. The rights were restored correctly? They were transferred to Arkham House? The copyright has been so far in the past, lost documentation, orphan works and uncertainties relating to the property are stretched more and more problematic. All they can say what we know is that if someone would challenge the authority of a court in the position to make a decision, but the decision could go either way. It 's doubtful it' ll worth everyone 's time and money, to try and resolve this in court, and this makes the situation de facto, as if the copyrights still hold, because risking no one wants to be sued ( although the copyright owner haven 't, at least so far, eager in the pursuit of their actions). So long as no one challenges their claim that people who claim to have rights, they have enabled by default. And the question won 't be really solved until 2032, when the last of Lovecraft' s works in his lifetime, published in the public (and I 'm with the exception of the few posthumous publications have appeared in 1944) will be there unless it 's another copyright extension, which would only push forward all of this mess.

As I contemplated this wicked entanglement, this inescapable pall clutching the fruits of human sentience, this tenacious threat keeping eager hearts at bay, I was reminded of words once written by Lovecraft himself—words I had read in a forbidden tome but never truly apprehended until then: that is not dead which can eternal lie.



Permalink | Comments | E-mail this story


0 comments: