Web is full of opinions, but without knowing the reasons for authors to publish why should we pay attention?

Valentine's Day, as usual, I received several anonymous at heart. "You're not funny, cock," "Why are you so smug shit", "You saw that in a repeat of Mock the week

, j ' was going to die. "This sort of thing.

But can I get that every day - all the actors do (besides not funny themselves, who are already dead). In fact, everyone does, it's one of the joys of the Internet age. On February 14, everyone used to wait for the chance of someone sharing their passionate feelings in disguise, and now happens all the time. Once you have a wall of Facebook, a Twitter account or just a name of someone to write anonymous letters Inc. is open for business. And it's not just people who are targets of foreign burning -. Restaurants, bars, hotels, books, movies and DVD are all objects of feelings so strong that those who argue that they are ashamed to reveal your identity

I am sure that shame is what it is. Like love, hate is something that makes us go with the red face. It is safer expressed in secret to avoid being rejected. If the coffee shop knew it was that he found the service rude or muffins for more money, which would make you feel vulnerable. This way you get to call the director warty witch face without having staff. Anonymity as a secret ballot is a sign of sincerity.

There was nothing honest about the negative comments of 30 The Good Life restaurant in Shrewsbury that were published online last fall. They came from the heart. In fact, from the heart: the 30 were written by different names, by Helen Griffiths, marketing director of Salford. But she was managing the marketing of The Good Life - it was not a complex exercise in reverse psychology. Flagrant violation of the "cold and inattentive" "hair on my quiche" personal aversion and real, hidden Ms Griffiths: the owner of vegetarian restaurant, Joanna Langfield. Griffiths was more angry that even tofu can be done, because Langfield Griffiths is the former partner and husband last August, was involved in a legal dispute with him.

review of online dispute, however, be considered illegal. Ms. Griffiths, after being warned by police harassment, had to publish an apology for the slander he had published, by carefully choosing the humus of the house and admit that he had "never been visited or ate in the restaurant. "That was the end of a long battle for Joanna Langfield to restore the good name of The Good Life in the face of a barrage of hate that caused a 25% drop in profits of the restaurant.

One can easily see the problem of Langfield. When a restaurant owner approaches a website to order the removal of negative reviews, saying they are biased, the application will be viewed with skepticism - in the unlikely event that the site for all staff see at all. Reviews online, either anonymously or you do not have a verifiable name, usually goes unanswered. We assume that the wisdom of crowds will ensure a reasonable perception is obtained, in general - that self-expression without censorship of hundreds of millions will tend toward the truth. Half the time it gives only average.

on Amazon as "beautifully written ... leaves the reader wondering it humbled himself still high ... a gift to us all, "it is because I had. But it was enough just to have a look over his rivals the works of Russian history, describing anonymously Molotov
aa Suspicions of Mr. Whicher

, who beat The Whisperers
Samuel Johnson Prize, "My God, what have the judges were thinking when they gave this book, Samuel Johnson prize? "

Find best price for : --Figes----Amazon----Shrewsbury--