The Az Home Security: How to keep your home and your family safe from crime

Regular price : USD 20.00
Lowest used price : USD 2.50
Lowest new price : USD 17.99

Parrot AR.Drone quadricopter controlled by touch, iPhone, iPod, iPhone and Android (Orange / Blue)

Binding: Electronics

Manufacturer: Parrot Inc.

Product

Parrot AR.Drone lets you see what the pilot sees. With Wi-Fi connectivity, you can control the Parrot AR.Drone to the accelerometer built into your iPhone, iPod touch, iPhone or Android device and phones and tablets based. The board cameras (one facing front, one facing down) lets you view real-time what the driver sees you complete complex flight maneuvers. Augmented reality is the world around you in a video game. The persecution of a fighter jet through the house, alone or with friends. Powerful processing allows the integration AR.Drone computer generated images directly in real time, streaming video to create a set of augmented reality with air-air missiles, interactive systems for targeting, fire and explosions. No ordinary RC helicopter, the military Parrot AR.Drone uses technology very stable level flight. The four rotors quadricopter uses two ultrasonic altimeters, a three-axis accelerometer, gyroscope multiple embedded platform of Linux continues to stabilize during flight. Drone can even compensate for the turbulence caused by wind. In fact, it's so easy to control, anyone can fly. Inside the home or away. Fly your Parrot AR.Drone anywhere. The helmet includes coverage protects the rotors during tight maneuvers around the walls and furniture is easily removed to reduce weight and wind resistance in flight outside. Helicopter is made of carbon fiber and high strength plastic. Li-Po battery included. Now, with applications for both Apple and Android IOS. Parrot AR.Drone for the gaming experience Brookstone today a whole new level! Note: AR.Drone can not send to addresses outside the United States. For over 14 years. Warning: choking hazard to small parts. By clicking "Add to Cart", you acknowledge that you have read, understood and accepted the terms of purchase of the customer. Click here to see the good

Amazon.com Product Description:

quadricopter AR.Drone
The remote control is an innovative device that combines the best of several worlds, including modeling, video games, and augmented reality. The AR.Drone is remotely controlled by the device (see compatibility below) and a number of sensors, including a front camera, vertical camera, altimeter and an ultrasound. The Drone also be used in video games as AR.FlyingAce, a duel between two AR.Drone.

The first quadricopter controlled by the iPod touch / iPhone / iPhone / Android

check with your device

With its onboard Wi-Fi, you can control the Parrot AR. unmanned aircraft with an iPod touch, iPod touch, iPhone or Android (OS 2.2 (Froyo) or higher, minimum 3 inches wide, multi-touch).

The Parrot AR.Drone

The quadricopter AR.Drone is the first that can be controlled by an iPod touch iPod touch, iPhone or Android (OS 2.2 (Froyo) or higher, minimum 3 inches wide, multi-touch).

• high-tech sensors offer simple driver
• 
  
A mixture of the kidnappers, the wide-angle camera high-speed camera and MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) accelerometers, gyro sensors and an ultrasonic sensor combined with a powerful onboard computer to control the AR.Drone easy. Just use your device and just tilt and touch to control the RA.

Connect and see
The Parrot AR.Drone generates its own Wi-Fi to connect the camera to control . The front view of the camera are transmitted to the display of the experimental device.

driver

AR.Drone

Autopilot allows takeoff and landing easy. After takeoff, the autopilot stabilizes the AR.Drone at a height of 80 centimeters. When you remove your finger from your device, the autopilot function automatically puts the drone hovering. Lost connection with the Drone? Autopilot takes over again and stabilizes the device before attempting a landing smoothly and safely.

includes inner and outer hulls

The shield protects the hull AR.Drone full impacts that occur during battles against enemies of nature hidden in the rooms of the house. The color of the hull is optimized aerodynamics, allowing more out of control.

high durability and easy repair

quadricopter AR.Drone is a carbon fiber and high resistance PA66 plastic. All parts can be modified to facilitate repairs.
• Free
control of the application

Please download the free AR.FreeFlight (iTunes App Store or Android Market) to control the RA.

• Augmented Reality Games
not only see what the camera sees before AR.Drone, but enjoy a variety of games augmented reality. AR.Games sold in the iTunes App Store and Android Market. Choose from a selection of single player and multiplayer using the Drone camera and augmented reality applications. Shoot the enemies and other drones.

Details

AR.Drone
Compatibility

Apple

IOS devices: iPod touch, iPhone and iPad
• Android OS devices
Optimized for: Samsung S Galaxy, Galaxy S II Samsung, Motorola Xoom, HTC Desire, also compatible with: HTC Desire HD, HTC Sensation, the Optimus 2x LG and Sony Ericsson Xperia Play

battery
flight time: 12 minutes

3 cell lithium polymer

Capacity: 1000 mAh
Charging time: 90 minutes

Regular price : USD 299.99
Lowest used price : USD 250.00
Lowest new price : USD 299.95

Special offer

Available from 1 Store

Store	Rating	Prices	Shipping	Link
	New	USD 299.95 Not Available	FREE with Super Saver Shipping Usually ships in 24 hours

Find product : --MEMS----Parrot--

Recently, Judge Roger Titus of Maryland declared unconstitutional a federal law that makes it a crime to use the Internet "with the intent to harass [or] cause significant emotional distress to a person in another State" . Following this decision, legislatures and courts of the country will have to rethink the existing laws on cyberbullying.



In the case of Maryland, William Cassidy had been accused of cyberbullying Alyce Zeoli, a former colleague and a Buddhist religious leader, based on their tweets, such as: "the world a favor and go kill yourself PS. Have a nice day. "Zeoli said tweets have raised fears for their safety had not left his house for a year and a half, except to see his psychiatrist. But the judge dismissed the case. His reasoning are lively in legislative debates on changing state and federal laws.

Judge Titus said that "threats of harm" may be punished, but no communication "intended to" emotional distress. Also considered relevant to the support (a tweet ) was communicated to the general public and not just the victim. The purpose of harassment may choose not to follow the tweets. "This," said the judge, "is in stark contrast to a phone call, letter or e -mail specifically addressed to and directed toward another person, and the difference ... is fundamental to the analysis of the First Amendment in this case. "Tito The judge also seemed to think it was unreasonable to have a reaction spectacular Zeoli said Cassidy tweets were not a "real threat".



Words are powerful. You can move the listeners or readers to action, even hurt themselves or someone. But in general, our society does not punish those who speak or write. Think of Ozzy Osbourne. Thirty years ago, recorded the song
Suicide Solution


. The song says that "Suicide is the only way out" and contains the letters barely recognizable, sung at a faster pace, "take the gun and try that, shoot, shoot, shoot."



When shooting 19 years himself in the head with a handgun of .22 caliber, having spent five hours listening to the music of Ozzy His parents sued Ozzy grief and dealer registration. The California Court of Appeal rejected his claim (pdf), noting that the speech does not lose its First Amendment protection simply because it "can evoke a mood of depression." The court said that the letters do not "order or mandate specific action at some point."



But the courts have ruled differently if the speech is addressed directly to an individual. In a case currently under appeal in Minnesota, William Melchert-Dinkel was accused of pressuring two people on the Internet to commit suicide. He posed as a nurse young woman attempting to enter in a suicide pact with his victims. The judge in the case of Minnesota said that Melchert-Dinkel "encouragement and advice prompted the imminent suicide of Nadia Kajouji and may have this effect." The judge in the If the label instant messaging as "lethal defense" and said that Melchert-Dinkel's words is "analogous to the category of unprotected speech known as" the fight against the words "and" incitement to imminent violation of the law. "" The judge distinguished the messages sent to the general public, Melchert-Dinkel said he had the right to make their pro-suicide message to the public - through the Internet, television, and so on - but has the right to send this message to a person vulnerable. Melchert-Dinkel lawyer appealed the case on the basis of the First Amendment.

How to be a direct threat? What if Melchert-Dinkel Nadia had just sent an mp3 file with Suicide Solution Ozzy? The courts are already considering the possibility of people "as" a social network can be used as evidence against them. In Wisconsin, a judge admitted evidence of a party referred MySpace a story in which a judge was injured. However, a court of Mississippi refused to use MySpace after a father of Ronald McDonald was wounded in the face to show that the mother should have custody of children.

"intent" standard is also problematic. As Judge Titus suggested, the standard is very broad and includes speech that is constitutionally protected. But the "intent" standard is, in some cases too narrow. It could allow someone to circumvent the legitimate prosecution arguing he had no intention to hurt, just made to be fun.


This strategy has worked for 40 years Elizabeth Thrasher, of which the victim was the daughter of the new girlfriend of her ex-husband. Thrasher published photos, phone number and email address in the 17 years of age in the "free field" to Craigslist, where people express their interest in casual sex. Due to "vent" the publication, 17 years was inundated with phone calls sexually explicit e-mails and text messages containing nude photos and requests for sex. A man even came to the restaurant where she worked Sonic after failing to scope on his phone, which eventually led to leave work because of fear. He said that the publication of the information made her feel as if "was created to kill and rape someone." Thrasher lawyer argued that the photos of the girl and her place of work and were available on the MySpace profile of the girl. He said the messages were "tantamount to a hoax" - and Thrasher was acquitted. under the standard Judge Titus, for example, a video was not a concern because the woman could have died. This problem of a contact person in front of the general population will be key in where the messages of personal information (such as a Google map to the house of a woman with a complaint, she wants men to act rape fantasy) and the sign itself does not intend to violence.
Find best price for : --When----Elizabeth----Nadia----suicide----Alyce----Cassidy----William----Maryland----Titus----Roger--

Europe

maximum price for the cost of mobile Internet access abroad too high, say MEPs

Internet access from mobile phones will continue to be hundreds of times more abroad than at home in the next 10 years according to the rules of the European Commission, politicians warned.

Parliament is to vote in the summer of new ceilings limit the amount mobile operators can charge passengers. The costs are still astronomical, with some networks in the UK charge "roaming" customers the equivalent of £ 3000 for a gigabyte of data - enough to download 200 songs or watch two hours of video. The proposed price caps, intended to operate until 2022, could be set at ? 500 (£ 420) 1 GB, but members have called for further reductions.

"We need better consumer value," said Irish MEP, Sean Kelly, which means that the cost of 1 GB falling to ? 90 for the year 2014. " The committee's proposals were a bit generous with the industry. Do not think the companies involved will go bankrupt, they can cry wolf, but they will not have the wolf at the door. The single market is free movement of goods, free movement of persons. We should try to charge any roaming around. "

Since the adoption of smart phones have been numerous reports of tourists come home to accounts run into thousands of pounds. Last year, Europe imposes ? 50 cap on expenditure data. Access to the Internet automatically drowned after the limit is reached, except by prior arrangement. However, tourists outside the euro area does not guarantee protection.

The average price of 1 GB in a European country was reduced by ? 7 for those who use their phones at home, according to research firm Berg Insight, despite three counts of £ 1 / GB least in the UK. However, the UK operators O2 and Orange customers a monthly fee £ 3/MB while on the continent, the equivalent of £ 3,000 / GB.

This fee applies even in countries where their own networks, Orange customers in the UK pay £ 3, when in France. Automatically bet Vodafone customers roaming in the discount rate, which cost £ 80/GB in Europe, but £ 200 in the world. These prices mean that customers tend to use the wifi instead of wireless connections to surf the Internet abroad.

"High prices are strangling the use of the Internet for travelers," said the United Kingdom, three of the director of corporate affairs. "European consumers must be able to access the Internet anywhere. It's like sitting with a friend, French or Spanish at your local bar and is paid 100 times higher than for the same drink. "

"We must be very ambitious," said Niebler a debate on the report. "The goal is to ensure that the costs and domestic prices are similar to European rates so as not to have a separate tariff for roaming over -. This is the ultimate goal of consumer organizations will agree vendors have a different opinion. "
The commission first introduced the roaming price cap in 2007 and is preparing a new series of cuts that are due to be voted by Parliament in June The reductions will be spread over a period of three years in July 2012 and ends in July 2014 and will remain in place until 10 years.

Find best price for : --Niebler----Angelika----Orange----roaming----Sean--

Will 2012 see the end of the Internet as we know it? The Judicial Committee sought to put an end to piracy on the Internet to stop legislation (soup) for a vote before Christmas next year. Watch this video of a guide for the struggle that is likely to become one of the great stories of next year Rushe Sunday Greg Chen
American Guardian

interactive computer

Gabriel Dance

thought they could exploit the Dajaz1.com blog, keep the secret for a year then come back and pretend that nothing really happened ... It may look like a bit of a surprise. Senator Ron Wyden began his investigation into the matter, sending requests for detailed information from the Attorney General, Eric Holder, ICE, John Morton, director of the White House IP czar Victoria Espinel. You can see the three letters included below. There are many questions for each of them with a big focus on what they were talking about crises (eg, the RIAA) and what they said. He also questioned the legal basis for seizures and even training and procedures. It will certainly be interesting to see the answers that are coming ..



Permalink | Comments | Email this article


Find best price for : --Wyden--

Find best price for : --Center----Data--

Find best price for : --Growing----Steven--

Via Julian Sanchez, you get the best headline of the story-we have seen so far on the soup. Written by Kevin M. Fogarty at ITWorld, reads as follows:

better idea of ??2011: Giving control of Internet content for a group that has pursued a dead grandmother

is a must read, pointing out the folly of the soup - while being very funny:

supporters are not willing to talk about commitment, not requiring drastic measures in the speech and piracy "crush" the artists and other creators of content, and seem, with good evidence, to follow the will of the donor soup, which has no interest in the public and an endless source of shame for the interest they believe is more important than the freedoms protected by the First Amendment, fourth and fifth.

On the positive side, it is not even one third of the Bill of Rights, so that the claims of proponents of SOPA are ready to crush the Constitution to fill their own pockets are much exaggerated by at least seven of rights.

other hand, are described, quite accurately, which is the control and guilt out of place:


the RIAA and the intent of SOPA is derived from the irrational rage that the world has changed and unquestioned belief that change is the lack of industry clients, who should be payable by the self-inflicted woes of the music industry .... We are seeing a recognition of the increasingly popular ... what a joke SOPA and PIPA but with him we have heard people believe that the project
Find best price for : --Internet----control----PIPA----RIAA----SOPA--

As we talked about how a group of companies that were listed by the Chamber of Commerce of U. S. such as soup / PIPA supporters need to be removed from the list, noting that although they have accepted a generic query on the fight against the sale of counterfeit products that are not compatible with local legislation as large soup / PIPA. It seems that others appear as "support" SOPA struggling to get out of the list too. Official list of the Judiciary Committee has included a handful of large companies such as the name of the law in support of the law as well - it's a bit strange, since law firms are usually not the official views of such things. They can express their views on these issues on behalf of clients, but the legislation is a direct support completely different ball game.

A group of lawyers (most of which have a long history of collaboration with the entertainment industry) sent a letter to the Judiciary Committee say they were agree with the analysis Floyd Abrams SOUP. That's it. They said their companies supported soup - and, indeed, there is an asterisk at the company said that the names of their companies are only for identification purposes

. However, the Judicial Committee took the names anyway and put them in the list of followers. Express a legal opinion on a bill extraordinarily different

to support the project. However, this ignores the Judiciary Committee and listed as defenders anyway.



From what we heard, many law firms are
not happy , and demanded the withdrawal official list of the Judiciary Committee. Among those who have already complained / been removed from the official list of Morrison & Foerster, Davis Wright Tremaine, Ireli & Manella, Covington & Burling. I hope that the Judiciary Committee removed all names and subjects, not a public apology blatantly with the names of companies that made no clear statement in support of proposed legislation. This is a very serious by staff of the House Judiciary Committee. They are so concerned with the list of supporters who have been naming the companies that do not support the bills. Then they used these statements to argue that there is broad support ...

Find best price for : --Floyd----SOPA--

, it seems that the MPAA and the Chamber of Commerce of U. S. can expect even more of their "friends" to support the soup. The final surprise is that the Heritage Foundation argued against SOUP, warning that dangerous would probably have unintended consequences. It shows both security issues and concerns of the First Amendment:

The requirement that search engines ignore links to other sites dishonest undermining the role of search firms as trusted intermediaries in the transmission of information to users. There are, of course, other circumstances in which the search engines and to omit information and links, for example, Google automatically filter pornography from its search results. But it has never been a government mandate that information is retained from the search results. The imposition of a mandate to represent the first step in a classic slippery slope of government interference that has no clear stopping point.

No doubt, the limitations of search engines and other third parties under SOPA also violate constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression. But even if it is not prohibited by law, such restrictions should be imposed only after the most careful consideration, only when absolutely necessary, and even then for the smallest possible.



What is really surprising is that the Heritage Foundation has a long history, far from being strongly in favor of more stringent copyright, and champion the efforts of the RIAA and MPAA legal to go to the drop of a hat on copyright:

Unlike some groups in Washington that are predictable anti-copyright, Heritage has historically taken the opposite position. It is called the Motion Picture Association of America decision to prosecute peer-to-peer pirates a "good choice" and suggested that the disruption of P2P networks to curb piracy, an idea that some politicians actually proposed is "a step in the right direction. "


[....] For now the group go the other is a surprise - and promotes rapid growth momentum against the SOPA. It became a lot (but certainly not all) of the force had been "left." However, recent concerns groups DC as the "right" tends to follow and respect (including CATO, CEI and now the site), it seems that many politicians on both sides of the aisle can be any more skeptical about the soup. You can have the voice to leave the House Judiciary Committee, but it can be difficult for him to survive a floor vote

Find best price for : --SOPA----Heritage----MPAA--