Blog Archive

Saturday, December 24, 2011

postheadericon Law Firms Removing Their Name From SOPA Supporters' List; SOPA 'Support' Crumbling

As we talked about how a group of companies that were listed by the Chamber of Commerce of U. S. such as soup / PIPA supporters need to be removed from the list, noting that although they have accepted a generic query on the fight against the sale of counterfeit products that are not compatible with local legislation as large soup / PIPA. It seems that others appear as "support" SOPA struggling to get out of the list too. Official list of the Judiciary Committee has included a handful of large companies such as the name of the law in support of the law as well - it's a bit strange, since law firms are usually not the official views of such things. They can express their views on these issues on behalf of clients, but the legislation is a direct support completely different ball game.

A group of lawyers (most of which have a long history of collaboration with the entertainment industry) sent a letter to the Judiciary Committee say they were agree with the analysis Floyd Abrams SOUP. That's it. They said their companies supported soup - and, indeed, there is an asterisk at the company said that the names of their companies are only for identification purposes

. However, the Judicial Committee took the names anyway and put them in the list of followers. Express a legal opinion on a bill extraordinarily different

to support the project. However, this ignores the Judiciary Committee and listed as defenders anyway.



From what we heard, many law firms are
not happy , and demanded the withdrawal official list of the Judiciary Committee. Among those who have already complained / been removed from the official list of Morrison & Foerster, Davis Wright Tremaine, Ireli & Manella, Covington & Burling. I hope that the Judiciary Committee removed all names and subjects, not a public apology blatantly with the names of companies that made no clear statement in support of proposed legislation. This is a very serious by staff of the House Judiciary Committee. They are so concerned with the list of supporters who have been naming the companies that do not support the bills. Then they used these statements to argue that there is broad support ...
thus between the Chamber of Commerce of U. S. extends what most companies thought they were supporting and pretend to say support for soup / PIPA, and the desire by the Judiciary Committee to conduct a legal analysis of a portion of the bill by some lawyers say their large law firms supported the project ... is the appearance of the facade of a complete business support is crumbling fast ...


Find best price for : --Floyd----SOPA--

0 comments: