Via Julian Sanchez, you get the best headline of the story-we have seen so far on the soup. Written by Kevin M. Fogarty at ITWorld, reads as follows:

better idea of ??2011: Giving control of Internet content for a group that has pursued a dead grandmother

is a must read, pointing out the folly of the soup - while being very funny:

supporters are not willing to talk about commitment, not requiring drastic measures in the speech and piracy "crush" the artists and other creators of content, and seem, with good evidence, to follow the will of the donor soup, which has no interest in the public and an endless source of shame for the interest they believe is more important than the freedoms protected by the First Amendment, fourth and fifth.

On the positive side, it is not even one third of the Bill of Rights, so that the claims of proponents of SOPA are ready to crush the Constitution to fill their own pockets are much exaggerated by at least seven of rights.

other hand, are described, quite accurately, which is the control and guilt out of place:


the RIAA and the intent of SOPA is derived from the irrational rage that the world has changed and unquestioned belief that change is the lack of industry clients, who should be payable by the self-inflicted woes of the music industry .... We are seeing a recognition of the increasingly popular ... what a joke SOPA and PIPA but with him we have heard people believe that the project
Find best price for : --Internet----control----PIPA----RIAA----SOPA--