Blog Archive

About Me

Thursday, November 3, 2011

postheadericon Content Industry Insists E-PARASITE Won't Rewrite DMCA, But Co-Author Of The Bill Admits That's The Plan

defenders were out of his way not only to distort the arguments against the project, but we have now reached the point of lying openly. The American Bar Association has a mailing list of its "Intellectual Property Section," and recently there was some discussion on E-PARASITE/SOPA, in which the multitude of problems and dangers of the bill raised. Not one to miss an opportunity to cheat, vice president of Viacom intellectual property and content protection, Stanley Pierre-Louis, decided to defend the law. I'll have more to say about their points later, but one key point seems not only wrong, but disagree with one of the guys who are supposed to "writing" to the bill. It is, Pierre-Louis has responded to claims that E-parasite is a backdoor to rewrite the DMCA safe harbors important to say:
criticism below SOUP views as a "back door" means "with which club" operators innocent sites by extending the scope of action for damages and subsidiary reducing the protection of the DMCA. Of course, this view ignores the fact that its provisions explicitly SOUP not be read to enlarge or diminish anyone. And it does not. The fact that the soup does not allow sites to "take deliberate steps to avoid confirming a high probability" of the offense is a restatement of the law as it exists today. There is no rule that allows the "willful blindness" irregularities evident in American law, and nothing in the DMCA or any other law was deemed to pretend otherwise.

course, this is one of the meanest tricks drawn by the authors of the bill. In some locations, just before the existing legislation and established completely decimated, they put in a little thing that says, "there is nothing in current law changes here ...," although the text states that do.
But then, why not visit

source
: Rep. Bob Goodlatte, co-author of the project legislation, and President of the IP in the House. Asked about the criticism of the law by Gautham Nagesh on the hill, Goodlatte

flat has admitted that the intention is to remove the guarantees of the DMCA


"I think it is unrealistic to think that we will continue to rely on the DMCA notification and removal of the provision," said Goodlatte.
"Whoever is involved in providing Internet services is expected to do certain things."


Find best price for : --SOPA----DMCA--

0 comments: